Online education is a double-edged sword. It provides an opportunity, unparalleled in the history of education, for students to learn at a distance and on their own schedules (Moore 2014, p. 20). The other side of the coin in online education is that there is isolation and that could be hard for students to deal with. I think that technology and the tools that it provides helps to bridge the isolation that students experience with distance education. The significance of technology to me as a future online instructor is that it will allow me to connect with students from anywhere in the world and do activities that are synchronous.
It is important to communicate clear expectations so that students will know what is expected of them at all times. Research into Practice states that high expectations become:
- Self-filling prophecy-students perform in ways that teachers expect.
- High expectations promote students who are motivated; scholars report a link between expectations and motivation.
- Elements of success are value and success. Students are more motivated when they see the value of learning.
Wyss, & Siebert 2014 provides an example of a syllabi that explains what the instructor wants in a post. The online instructors write expectations for their course but some of the expectations are ambiguous and it leads the students to question how many points will we get for this posting? What constitutes a quality response and how is it determined? Take a look at what they consider to be unclear expectations in an online expectation board:
The quality of your participation is what matters. You should plan on posting your own thoughts and then responding to the ideas and thoughts of at least 2 other participants every week. This will typically require you to log into the discussion multiple times throughout the week. I encourage you to be thoughtful in your responses and bring in examples from your own experiences. I also encourage you to be supportive and helpful to the other students in the class. We don’t have to agree with each other but there is a level of respect that is required for the discussions to be productive and avoid destructiveness. This level of respect is a little bit trickier in the online format than it is in the typical classroom where you can read expressions and hear tone. Please keep that in mind in all responses.
Here in this expectation the students do not necessarily know what makes up a quality response. Dr. Paige (Walden University) would tell us that he expected that we had scholarly responses to the postings. We knew that we had to respond to our fellow students by using the course readings and other information we found on our own to support our responses. We were given a clear and well planned rubric to which he faithfully used for each assignment; so we knew how to improve our threaded post or course project.
Additional considerations that the instructor should take into account are:
- Course overview and introduction
- Learning objectives and outcomes
- Assessment and measurement
- Resources and materials
- Learner interaction
- Course technology
- Learner support
- Accessibility
I think that the instructor should take into account the work life and family life of the students that take online courses. In last week’s initial post I wrote about planning for the unplanned and I must say I did not understand the significance of this statement until Chuck explained in his post what that meant. Life happens in these courses and students need to make sure that they email the instructor so that they will not lose points in an activity.
References
Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R. (2010). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Education Partners, Inc. (n. d.). Research into practice: Importance of
high expectations. http://gearup.ous.edu/sites/default/files/Research-Briefs/ResearchBriefHighExpectations.pdf
Wyss, V. F. & Siebert, C. (2014). The development of a discussion rubric
for online courses: Standardizing expectations of graduate students in online scholarly discussions. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning. 58(2), 99-107.